Which of the following is a common evaluation criterion used by promotion boards?

Performance evaluations and records are a fundamental criterion used by promotion boards because they provide a comprehensive picture of a service member's capabilities, achievements, and overall contributions to the Army. These evaluations reflect an individual's job performance, leadership qualities, and potential for future responsibilities, making them a crucial factor in determining eligibility for promotion.

Performance evaluations present quantifiable data and qualitative assessments from superiors, highlighting strengths, areas for improvement, and accomplishments over a specific period. This information allows promotion boards to assess candidates against their peers in a standardized manner, ensuring that decisions are made based on merit and demonstrated performance rather than solely on length of service or unit assignment history.

While factors such as length of service, peer reviews, and unit assignment history may play a role in the overall evaluation process, they do not provide the same level of insight into an individual's performance and readiness for promotion as the documented evaluations and records. Thus, performance evaluations and records stand out as the most relevant and reliable criteria for promotion boards.